In this video we present 6 exercise blood flow restriction (BFR) variations for the rotator cuff muscles (RCs). 0:05-Flexion. 0:12-Abduction. 0:20-E
March 29, 2020
We have just released the brand-new progressive web app “Fit Cuffs Training”, with online and offline availability by downloading it to your phone jus
April 15, 2020

In a recent video a we propose the use of BFR-interval training as a potential part of rehab, but it seems equal as relevant for performance. In thi

April 9, 2020

In a recent video a we propose the use of BFR-interval training as a potential part of rehab, but it seems equal as relevant for performance.

In this summary we present the results from a newly published paper by Christiansen et al. 2020 and two preceding papers with the same exercise protocol:

AIM: The effect of BFR-interval training on different parameters of performance.

PROTOCOL: 10 Well-trained men completed 6 weeks of interval cycling with one (BFR-Leg) vs. (No-BFR-Leg), workload was matched between legs. The participants trained 3/week for 6 weeks. 5-min warm-up at 30% of maximum workload (Wmax) followed by 2 min of rest.

3 periods of 3 x 2-min cycling bouts were performed separated by 1 min and each period by 2 min of active recovery pedaling. Complete exercise time 24 min. Target intensity of the 1., 2. and 3. period was 60%, 70%, and 80% Wmax, respectively, with a personal preferred cadence.

BFR-Leg only: Pressure ~178 mmHg, deflation immediately after every exercise bout (intermittent BFR).

RESULTS: Time to exhaustion during exhaustive exercise, BFR-Leg ~21% vs. NO-BFR-Leg ~10%. Acute arterial blood flow in BFR-Leg ~52% lower during exercise and 308% higher during recovery vs. no change in No-BFR-Leg. Chronic arterial blood flow before, during and after knee-extensor tests did not change in the NO-BFR-Leg, but improved in the BFR-Leg. Resting femoral artery diameter increased only in BFR-Leg ~4%.

Power output during knee-extensor exercise, BFR-Leg vs. No-BFR-Leg improved ~20% and ~9%, respectively. Knee extensor exercise performance: BFR-Leg vs. No-BFR-Leg improved ~23% and ~11%, respectively.

Venous-arterial K+ difference. Simplified as no change in the No-BFR-Leg, but increased in the BFR-Leg. Thigh oxygen delivery for the BFR-Leg (~23% and ~13% in sub-max and near-max tests, respectively). No significant change in the No-BFR-Leg.

Reduced lactate release at both intensities (~34% and ~16% in both conditions, respectively). No change in No-BFR-Leg.

CONCLUSION: Well-trained individuals can increase V̇O2max and time to exhaustion by use BFR-interval training, explained by various physiological mechanisms.

Christiansen et al. (2020) Training with blood flow restriction increases femoral artery diameter and thigh oxygen delivery during knee-extensor exercise in recreationally trained men.

Christiansen et al. (2019) Blood flow-restricted training enhances thigh glucose uptake during exercise and muscle antioxidant function in humans.

Christiansen et al. (2019) Cycling with blood flow restriction improves performance and muscle K+ handling and blunts the effect of antioxidant infusion in humans.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 10, 2026

The Science Behind the Fit Cuffs Pressure Calculator V2

Does auto adjusted blood flow restriction (BFR) training improve muscle growth and strength compared to fixed-pressure cuffs? In this first 8-week within-subject study using the Fit Cuffs BFR system, researchers found no meaningful differences in hypertrophy, strength gains, or perceived discomfort between autor and non-auto conditions. When pressure was prescribed relative to limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and training variables were standardized, both approaches produced significant improvements. Here’s what coaches, clinicians, and lifters need to know about auto vs fixed-pressure BFR.
February 24, 2026

Automatic Pressure adjustments during Blood Flow Restricted (BFR) Exercise – A randomized within-subject 8-week trial

Does auto adjusted blood flow restriction (BFR) training improve muscle growth and strength compared to fixed-pressure cuffs? In this first 8-week within-subject study using the Fit Cuffs BFR system, researchers found no meaningful differences in hypertrophy, strength gains, or perceived discomfort between autor and non-auto conditions. When pressure was prescribed relative to limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and training variables were standardized, both approaches produced significant improvements. Here’s what coaches, clinicians, and lifters need to know about auto vs fixed-pressure BFR.

In a recent video a we propose the use of BFR-interval training as a potential part of rehab, but it seems equal as relevant for performance.


In thi
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using this website you agree to our Data Protection Policy.
Read more