Should You do Continuous or Intermittent BFR Training!? ⬇️
October 6, 2021
Improve parameters of football(soccer) performance by means of “functional” BFR Training!? ⬇️
November 2, 2021

Can “functional” BFR Training augment running performance!? ⬇️

November 2, 2021

In this post we present the outstanding results from a BFR-running RCT conducted on physically active women.

The study combined interval running with BFR and showed that training intensity and pressure are important for aerobic, anaerobic, and muscular performance!
Purpose: Comparison of different BFR stimuli and exercise intensities on aerobic, anaerobic, and muscle strength in 4 different groups, as a dose response study.

A 4-week intervention period consisted of 3d/week, 10 sets for each session as 2 min running on a treadmill with BFR interspersed by 1 min of recovery without BFR. The pressure was estimated from thigh circumference.

The four groups:
(IP-CE): Increasing Pressure with Constant Exercise intensity. (CPP-IE): Constant Partial Pressure with increasing Exercise intensity. (IP-IE) Increasing pressure with increasing exercise intensity. (CCP-IE): Constant Complete occlusion with increasing exercise intensity.

The study demonstrated improvements in all aerobic and anaerobic variables in all 4 groups, with a trend for greater gains for all parameters in response to progressing intensity and high BFR stimuli.

The CCP-IE (complete occlusion) group had a trend for the greatest overall effect (Vo2max Ꙟ 14.8%). – Though, it might be contrary for safety and could hypnotically lead to adverse events. Nevertheless, this is not the first study that shows a higher BFR stimuli is superior and this was also conducted on a young population + a trend for higher Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) in the CCP-IE group.

Conclusion of the study: Interval based BFR-running with higher BFR stimuli and progressive intensity is superior for overall effectiveness.

We do not recommend complete occlusion (100% Limb Occlusion Pressure) / 100% AOP for the general public, but it is common practice that you either progress effective running time or pace.

Another discovery is that circumference seems to be a legit way to set the pressure, while using Fit Cuffs, we recommend that you use Fit Cuffs Training App – training.fitcuffs.com

Source: Amani et al. (2019) Effects of Blood Flow Restriction and Exercise Intensity on Aerobic, Anaerobic, and Muscle Strength Adaptations in Physically.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 24, 2026

Automatic Pressure adjustments during Blood Flow Restricted (BFR) Exercise – A randomized within-subject 8-week trial

Does auto adjusted blood flow restriction (BFR) training improve muscle growth and strength compared to fixed-pressure cuffs? In this first 8-week within-subject study using the Fit Cuffs BFR system, researchers found no meaningful differences in hypertrophy, strength gains, or perceived discomfort between autor and non-auto conditions. When pressure was prescribed relative to limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and training variables were standardized, both approaches produced significant improvements. Here’s what coaches, clinicians, and lifters need to know about auto vs fixed-pressure BFR.

Can “functional” BFR Training augment running performance!? ⬇️
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using this website you agree to our Data Protection Policy.
Read more